Saturday, February 28, 2015
Negative Rates Grow
Recently, we posted about negative interest
rates for savings accounts in Denmark. Now, it appears that negative
interest rates are sweeping Europe. Earlier this week, Germany sold
five-year government bonds with a YTM of negative .08 percent.
Normally, we would make sure to put an exclamation point after that
sentence, but Finland auctioned off negative interest rate government
bonds earlier this month. The Netherlands, France, Belgium, Austria, and
Italy also all have negative YTM bonds outstanding. Even more unique,
an entrepreneur in Denmark took out a small business loan at negative .0172 percent! In other words, she is actually being paid to borrow money. Sign us up!
The negative interest rate phenomenon appears to have hit the U.S as
JPMorgan Chase announced that it would start charging some institutional
clients to hold their money.
Friday, February 27, 2015
Sweet Home Chicago?
Moodys' cut the credit rating on Chicago's debt to Baa2,
two steps above junk status. The city's debt still has a negative
outlook, meaning that another rating drop could happen in the future.
The rating cut was caused in large part by the city's underfunded public
pension plan. Only Detroit has a lower credit rating than Chicago among
the largest U.S. cities, and Illinois is lowest credit rated state. S&P and Fitch maintained their credit rating on Chicago.
Wednesday, February 25, 2015
Shareholders Get Paid
2014 was a record year for shareholders of S&P 500 stocks. Companies in the S&P 500 paid out a record $350.4 billion
in dividends during the year. The total dividends paid equals the GDP
of South Africa. Share buybacks are expected to reach about $550
billion, the largest value since 2007. So, for 2014, the total payouts
to shareholders are expected to be just under $900 billion, topping the
$846 billion paid in 2007.
Tuesday, February 24, 2015
Allergan Golden Parachute
Allergan CEO Davis Pyott may have a very soft landing if the Activas
acquisition of Allergan is completed. Actavis announced that after the
merger was complete, it planned to replace most of Allergan's
executives. In Pyott's case,
if he were fired after the merger, he would receive $89 million in cash
and stock for equity rewards that have yet to vest, $9.91 million in
cash, and $2 million in accrued pension and health benefits, for a total
payout of over $100 million!
Inventory Shortage Costs
What is the optimal days' sales in inventory? It depends! Too much in
inventory will result in large opportunity costs. In other words, a
company has cash tied up in inventory that costs the company money and
does not earn a return. However, too little inventory can be problematic
as the company can experience shortage costs. In this article,
the costs of inventory shortages are explained. For example, although
just-in-time delivery is popular, it does create problems in supply
chain management. Not only does a company need to monitor its suppliers
to ensure they will be able to meet obligations, but a company must also
monitor the supplier of the company's supplier. A disruption at any
point in the supply chain can result in an inventory shortage. So, how
much does an supply chain disruption affect a company's value? One study indicates that supply chain disruption can reduce a company's value by up to 7 percent.
Saturday, February 21, 2015
RBS Goodwill Writeoff
An expected writeoff
by the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) is further evidence that
acquisitions are an inexact science. It is believed that RBS will
announce a £4 billion ($6.2 billion) writeoff
related to its acquisition of Citizens Financial. The writeoff will
almost entirely erase the company's 2014 profit. RBS has already sold 29
percent of Citizens Financial in a public offering, and plans to sell
more of the company. RBS purchased Citizens for $130 billion in 1988,
but the current market capitalization of Citizens is a much smaller
$13.7 billion.
Mutual Fund Efficiency
In a nod to market efficiency, 2014 was one of the worst years on record for mutual fund managers, with fewer than 20 percent beating their benchmark. In the article, several reasons are given for the poor performance. For example, relative, not absolute skill is what matters. In other words, if fund managers as a whole are
getting smarter, it is harder for an individual fund manager to
distinguish themselves from the pack. Additional explanations, such as
the necessity of small caps doing better than large caps, cash not being
a drag on the fund return, and good performance of international
stocks, are given as possible explanations for the poor performance in
2014. While we see merit in these explanations, a simpler reason also
emerges. In very few years do mutual fund managers as a whole outperform the market. This leads us to the argument that the market is efficient and the reasons given in the article are only reasons that mutual fund managers performed even more poorly than usual.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)