Tuesday, February 19, 2013
DSO Interpretation
While the textbook discusses a cross sectional comparison of the components of the operating and and cash cycles, a recent article
discusses a method to examine accounts receivable (AR) and days' sales
outstanding (DSO) in a time series. For example, if AR is growing more
quickly than DSO, the company could be offering credit terms that are
too generous, or is attempting to book sales at the end of the quarter
to make its performance look better. The examination of health care education company Healthstream in the article indicates neither of those. Two things we would like to point out in the article: The author points out that he
likes to use end-of-quarter numbers rather than average receivables in
his calculations. Remember, ratios can be calculated a number of
different ways, and each has its own interpretation. So, if you are
using ratios calculated by someone else, make sure you know how the
ratio was calculated. Second, the author cautions that an investor
should look into the root causes of the changes in ratios, which is
always an important step any time you are examining financial ratios.
Thursday, February 14, 2013
Stock Yields
Stock returns include a dividend yield, but Chris Brightman, head of investment management at Research Affiliates, argues that the yield
should include a buyback yield. His logic is that if a company
maintains its profits and the price earnings ratio remains constant, if
the company buys back 2 percent of its stock, the stock price should
increase at 2 percent as well. This is similar to the dividend discount
model in which the stock price grows at the dividend growth rate.
Unfortunately, Brightman's math indicates that the stock market return
going forward is only about 6 percent, significantly below the
historical average.
Financial Romance
Often, people outside finance view financial professionals as number
crunchers, lacking emotion and feeling. We disagree with this idea, and
further would argue that financial professionals are very romantic.
Wednesday, February 13, 2013
S&P 500 Dividends
A recent article geared toward investors yields some interesting dividend information.
For example, over the past 10 years, the dividend payout ratio for the
S&P 500 Index as a whole has been as low as 50.76 percent in 2002
and as high as 107.47 percent in 2008. Over this 10 year period, 18 S&P 500 companies have been able to reduce the payout ratio by more than five percent per year,
but more impressively, eight of those companies have actually increased
dividends by more than seven percent per year. These companies have
been able to reduce the payout ratio but increase dividends, an
indication of the fast earnings growth in these eight companies.
Monday, February 11, 2013
Spin-Off Value
The anti-merger, or spin-off, seems to be benefiting investors.
The Bloomberg Spin-Off Index (BSOI) is up 41 percent in the past year
compared to the 12 percent increase in the S&P 500. For the past 17
years, spin-offs have outperformed the S&P 500 by 13 percent in the
year following the spin-off. There are structural reasons that this
anomaly might exist including: the new management is forced to run the
new business more efficiently, the new company lacks analyst coverage
resulting in forced sales by index funds and investors who didn't buy
the stock directly, and a soft landing set up by the by the parent, who
might undervalue the spin-off to lower expectations on the new company.
Merger Valuation
A recent article in CFO
outlines potential pitfalls in mergers. For example, the article
advises avoiding over-optimism about the company, a flaw discussed in
behavioral finance. The article also argues that the bidder should not
pay for synergies unless they are well defined. For example, one CFO
said that his company paid for synergies in one acquisition because the
target would be rolled into a current division, which allowed for cost
savings from eliminating part of the existing management, the board of
directors, and other expenses that the target incurred. However, he
would not include synergies if the target were in an entirely new
business. The last pitfall we would like to mention here is to keep
financial models honest. Logical errors are much more common than
mathematical errors. For example, if margins are increasing, this cannot
be infinite. After all, you can never get a 100 percent margin, and
something a lot lower is more reasonable.
Friday, February 8, 2013
1 + 1 = 3
Recently David Einhorn, the Greenlight Capital hedge fund manager, has
suggested that Apple should issue preferred stock as a way of reducing
the company's cash balance and increasing shareholder value. Einhorn argues
that by giving the preferred stock to current shareholders, the market
price of the preferred plus the new reduced price of the common stock
(there would be a price drop since cash available to common shares would
decrease) would be greater than the current stock price. In essence,
Einhorn is arguing against M&M's pie model of the corporation. While
we believe that excess cash does not create shareholder value, the idea
that market participants can be fooled by adding preferred stock to a
company's capital structure seems doubtful.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
