Sunday, October 23, 2016
AT&T Buys Time Warner
AT&T announced that it had agreed to purchase Time Warner for about $85 billion.
Under the terms of the deal, Time Warner shareholders will receive
$107.50 per share, half in stock and half in cash. The share price
represents about a 20 percent premium to Time Warner's closing price on
Friday. Even though the terms of the deal have been announced, Time
Warner shareholders and the Department of Justice still must approve the
deal, and the chair of the Senate subcommittee on antitrust said the committee would examine the deal as well. Of course this is not the first time that Time Warner has been acquired: In 2000, AOL purchased Time Warner
for $160 billion in one of the worst deals in history. In fact, the
company had a $99 billion loss in 2003 and things went so bad, the
merged company eventually changed its name back to Time Warner.
Monday, October 3, 2016
Ethics In Finance
You may have noticed that there is not a lot of discussion of ethics in
your textbook. A major reason is that from a financial view, if the
market or society values ethical behavior, unethical behavior by a
company will hurt its market value, thus defeating the goal of
maximizing shareholder value. Consider the case of Wells Fargo, which is
under fire for fraudulently creating up to 2 million deposit and credit
card accounts. In addition to the fines paid by the company, last week,
California announced that it was barring state transactions with Wells Fargo, including underwriting state bond issues. Today, Chicago announced
that it was divesting $25 million that it has invested with Wells Fargo
and next week Illinois plans to announce its plans to suspend Wells
Fargo from the state investment network. So, while Wells Fargo may have
temporarily increased value by fraudulent actions, these actions will
now negatively affect shareholder value.
Ticked Off
If you look at stock prices, you will see bid and ask prices that may
only be different by a penny. What you may not realize is that this has
only occurred since 2001. Prior to that, stock prices were quoted in
eighths or sixteenths, so a price quote of 40 1/8 meant $40.125. Part of
the reason for the change was that the bid-ask spread was the dealer
profit, which also meant that investors were paying this difference.
However, it has been argued that small cap stocks were hurt by
decimalization because market makers have less incentive to trade less
liquid small cap stocks and this has also lead to less research on small
companies. Today, a pilot program
was begun in which 10 small company stocks began trading on 5 cent tick
sizes, meaning the smallest change in the stock price for these stocks
is now a nickel. About 1,200 stocks will eventually be included in the
test program, with three different groups with different trading rules. The goal of the study is to determine if increasing the tick size can lead to increased liquidity in small cap stocks.
Ticked Off
If you look at stock prices, you will see bid and ask prices that may only be different by a penny. What you may not realize is that this has only occurred since 2001. Prior to that, stock prices were quoted in eighths or sixteenths, so a price quote of 40 1/8 meant $40.125. Part of the reason for the change was that the bid-ask spread was the dealer profit, which also meant that investors were paying this difference. However, it has been argued that small cap stocks were hurt by decimalization because market makers have less incentive to trade less liquid small cap stocks and this has also lead to less research on small companies. Today, a pilot program was begun in which 10 small company stocks began trading on 5 cent tick sizes, meaning the smallest change in the stock price for these stocks is now a nickel. About 1,200 stocks will eventually be included in the test program, with three different groups with different trading rules. The goal of the study is to determine if increasing the tick size can lead to increased liquidity in small cap stocks.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)